Super Mayor Orillia
Open menu
All positionsGovernance

Strong-mayor veto needs a public protocol

The Mayor issued his first strong-mayor veto on November 17, 2025. Council tried to override and failed. A tool this powerful needs a written, public protocol that says when, why, and with what notice it gets used.

First published
2026-05-18
Last revised
2026-06-03
Versions
2

On November 17, 2025, Mayor Don McIsaac issued his first strong-mayor veto, striking down a Council amendment that would have added approximately $700,000 to the City's reserves for road and sidewalk work. Council attempted to override the veto at a special meeting on November 28, 2025, falling short of the two-thirds threshold required under the Municipal Act, 2001 (Part VI.1). The override failed.

Whether you agreed with the specific veto is a separate question from the one I want to put on the table: a tool this powerful, with an override threshold Council has already failed to reach once, should not be used without a publicly written rulebook for when and how it gets used.

Strong-mayor powers were extended to Orillia by the Province in 2025. They cannot be repealed by Council. What Council and the Mayor CAN do is bind themselves, publicly, to a protocol that constrains how the veto is exercised. That protocol is what is missing today.

I would commit, in writing and before taking office, to a four-part veto protocol. First: no veto without a written rationale released to the public the same day — naming the provincial priority a by-law veto is in service of, or, for a budget veto, the specific fiscal reasoning behind it. Second: a minimum 72-hour advance notice to Council before a veto is filed, so the Mayor and Council can attempt to resolve the disagreement in the open. Third: no veto on routine procedural matters, appointments, or by-laws unrelated to a stated provincial priority. Fourth: an annual public review where every veto exercised that year is reviewed against the protocol.

The protocol does not change the override threshold. What it does is make every veto a deliberate, defensible act with a paper trail. If I am elected and Council wants to enshrine the protocol in a formal Council resolution that future mayors would have to publicly repudiate to ignore, I would support that. The provincial authority is not going away. The question is whether the city sets norms around it or lets each mayor define their own.

What I read to form this position

Sources

How residents shaped this

Resident input

  • This position is newly published. I am especially seeking resident input on two questions: should the 72-hour notice window be longer, and should some categories of decision be exempt from veto entirely?
Your turn

Share your input

Share your perspective with Ori. Every submission is read and considered when this position is next revised.

2000 characters left · Anonymous · No account required
Version history2 versions1 correction

Every change to this position is logged in public, oldest version preserved. A correction means I had a fact wrong and fixed it; a change of mind means my reasoning shifted.

  1. 2026-06-03
    Correction

    Re-audited against the public record. The override attempt was held November 28, 2025 (not December 12), and this was the Mayor's first strong-mayor veto — not his first use of the powers, which he had used earlier in 2025 on the CAO appointment.

    WasCouncil attempted to override the veto at a special meeting on December 12, 2025.
    NowCouncil attempted to override the veto at a special meeting on November 28, 2025.
    Source: OrilliaMatters — override of mayor's budget veto fails
  2. 2026-05-18

    Initial publication after direct corpus review. Corrected an earlier draft that placed the first veto in December 2025 — it was November 17, 2025, with the override attempt failing November 28, 2025.